The anti-launch system tested in Cremona is now law: from 2026 we will see it in all FIA races

Columns: News and Previews
With the council of October 16th, FIA definitively approved the "anti-launch" modification to the rear bumpers seen on track in Cremona on the Academy Trophy vehicles. A highly debated and criticized solution on social media, it still has much to prove.

During the days of the OK World Cup in Cremona and the following days, social media buzzed with ironic, iconoclastic, outraged, horrified comments. The general sentiment, as well as the one perceived in the paddock among insiders, was quite unanimous and overall "unfavorable."
 

Nonetheless, since government decisions are not made based on social media comments or under the tent, from 2026 we will see the plastic appendages and modified bumpers on all vehicles as per the official FIA announcement. Following this, the same will apply to all registered races such as International events, with the ASN clearly expected to act accordingly to the FIA's "Recommendation" aimed at 2027:
 

01.04.2026 - Mandatory in FIA Karting competitions
01.04.2026 - Mandatory in Karting competitions included in the International Sporting Calendar and using CIK-FIA homologated engines; recommended in all other international competitions in Group 2 categories. Depending on product availability, also recommended in national competitions in Group 3 [Mini] categories in support of competitions included in the International Sporting Calendar.
01.01.2027 - Mandatory in all competitions included in the International Sporting Calendar.
01.01.2027 - Recommendation made to ASNs to make this safety device mandatory in all categories, including Group 3 or similar.
31.12.2027 - End of production of rear wheel guards with this homologation.


According to some, this adds further costs to karting, already an expensive discipline by itself — but this is only one side of the matter. Many doubts heard from people who have worked in karting for 40 years or more concern the actual effectiveness of the system. A similar system, adopted about twenty years ago on Rotax series vehicles, was rejected precisely by the FIA, which today promotes a method based on a similar principle but, considering its functioning in case of contact, is less efficient.
 

An anti-launch system designed to prevent a kart from launching onto the wheels of other karts was developed and brought to the track with decent success by Rotax about 20 years ago, but was later banned by the FIA because in the event of strong side impacts some parts could detach.


Ironically, in those years it was the FIA that pushed Rotax to comply with standard bumpers, only to study within about a decade a system that resembles the one it itself banned. Doubts also concern how the presence of these appendages might negatively affect drivers' racing behavior in the medium term. This hypothesis is perhaps the most "ideological" but also the most profound and sensible when considering the formative nature of our sport.

Putting nostalgia aside, this tends to make a sport that—at least for younger drivers—has the purpose of education less formative. Over the years, little and inconsistent interventions have been made regarding minimum weight, minimum age for access to more powerful categories (we have already discussed 11-year-olds in OK-NJ and possible safety scenarios), tracks, marshal training, drivers' codes of conduct, drivers' briefing attendance, and not least track conditions. The chosen path is to avoid a kart launching over another, whereas analyzing many (unfortunately) severe accident dynamics, they often are so-called "T Bone" incidents (meaning when a stationary kart on the track is hit side-on by another kart at speed, forming a graphical “T”). This is the dynamic of serious accidents such as the frightening Bondarev accident in OKJ in 2022 at Zuera, or those of Antonelli in Portimao 2020, or Lacorte and Babichkova in Adria a few years ago, to name the most "famous." Unfortunately, accidents occur every week (often in Rental karting, which use almost fully integrated protections relative to the chassis), and paradoxically those involving a vehicle rollover where the driver is ejected are not necessarily the most severe.
 

Make no mistake, this is not ranking the severity of accidents or claiming that this anti-launch system is useless for improving safety. The introduction is widely debated for numerous legitimate reasons, and the effect it will have on the very nature of the sport remains to be seen. The debate remains open…

Created by: fmarangon2 - 24/10/25

Browse by Columns

RACES

INTERVIEWS

ON THE TECHNICAL SIDE

FROM KART TO F1

SIM - Racing Simulator

OPINION

Newsletter

Stay tuned!
Sign up for our mailing list